Sharon's Rico-Whistleblower

Sharon's Rico-Whistleblower



Sharons Video Bar


Sunday, May 20, 2018


Fake news used by Grazzini-Rucki and her allies to distort the truth

Fake news used by Grazzini-Rucki and her allies to distort the truth

In a post published last Friday, Mr. Volpe repeated a false statement that David Rucki was present in the room with Samantha Rucki while she testified during her mother’s criminal trial last July.
The inaccurate claim that David Rucki and his sister, Dr. Tammy Love were in the room with Samantha when she testified has been continually used as a talking-point by supporters of Grazzini-Rucki since she was convicted for her role in the disappearance of her children.
Mr. Volpe is based in Chicago, Illinois and he disseminates Grazzini-Rucki’s propaganda masqueraded as news. He has never attended any of the court proceedings involving Sandra Grazzini-Rucki and the other adults charged and convicted for their role in the disappearance of Samantha and Gianna Rucki. Mr. Volpe is frequently interviewed with Grazzini-Rucki on podcasts about her criminal case and family court drama.
Key facts about testimony by Samantha Rucki
Samantha and Gianna Rucki were subpoenaed by their mother’s criminal attorney Stephen Grigsby to testify at her criminal trial. As previously reported, an agreement was eventually reached between the attorneys that Gianna Rucki would not testify, but Samantha Rucki would be required to testify in the trial.
The text below is from a story published on July 22, 2016 on Missing in Minnesota.
To lesson the trauma Samantha Rucki would endure by having to testify in her mother’s criminal trial, her testimony was taken in a small conference room and was live-streamed into the courtroom for the jury.
Samantha Rucki arrived at the courthouse in Hastings before 1PM yesterday and was in a conference room on the second floor as she waited for her attorney, Pat Elliott to arrive.
Grigsby walked into the conference before Samantha’s attorney had arrived, in an attempt to question Samantha about her testimony. Grigsby was instructed to leave the conference room and a Dakota County Sheriff’s Deputy guarded the door to prevent unauthorized access until Samantha’s attorney arrived minutes later.
An agreement was also reached to prevent Sandra Grazzini-Rucki from being in the conference room during Samantha’s testimony. Grigsby took testimony from Grazzini-Rucki, who waved her rights granted by the Confrontation Clause found in the  Sixth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution to confront any witnesses in her criminal trial.
Judge Colleen King remained in the courtroom, while Judge Ashaug, Grigsby, Keena, and a court reporter participated in the conference with Samantha during her testimony. Samantha’s attorney and her grandmother (David Rucki’s mother), were also in the conference, but were not shown on the video during Samantha’s testimony.
Sandra Grazzini-Rucki showed no emotion during her daughter’s testimony. Her attorney gave Grazzini-Rucki a box of tissues while Samantha was testifying, but Grazzini-Rucki never took a tissue.
Samantha’s testimony lasted around 20 minutes.
Samantha Rucki’s testimony validated her previous statements to law enforcement that her father was not abusive to her, nor did Samantha witness her father be abusive to any of her siblings.
A review of the court transcript confirms both the testimony of Samantha, the people in the room during her testimony and the accuracy of the story published on Missing in Minnesota from July 22, 2016.
Attorney Pat Elliott, counsel for Samantha Rucki, was present in the conference room at the time of her testimony during her mother’s criminal trial. Mr. Elliott confirmed this morning that the people in the room included Judge Karen Asphaug, Kathy Keena, Stephen Grigsby, a court reporter, and Samantha’s grandmother.
Mr. Elliott also confirmed that David Rucki was not present in or near the room at any time during Samantha’s testimony.
Since David Rucki was a witness in the criminal trial of Grazzini-Rucki, he would be prohibited from being in the courtroom during any testimony, as all witness were sequestered and were only allowed in the courtroom during their own testimony.
The agenda to smear the testimony of Samantha Rucki
Michael Volpe. Picture source: YouTube
The frantic attempts to create “alternative facts” surrounding the testimony of Samantha Rucki has made it difficult for Mr. Volpe and others to keep their own facts straight.
In Mr. Volpe’s book he co-authored with Grazzini-Rucki’s family court attorney Michelle MacDonald, they wrote that David Rucki “waited just outside the door.” In another version, Volpe places David Rucki and his sister both in the room during Samantha’s testimony.
They simply can’t keep their story straight.
The facts surrounding the testimony of Samantha Rucki have been twisted by Grazzini-Rucki and her supporters over the last year. By incorrectly claiming that David Rucki and his sister were in the room when Samantha testified, it creates the false narrative that she was forced to testify as her father and aunt were in the room, while her mother was excluded.
Also, Samantha Rucki did not testify via “Skpye” as claimed by Mr. Volpe and others, but rather through a secure video-conference system.
Again, by claiming the testimony was conducted via “Skype” an attempt is being made to diminish her testimony. The decision to allow Samantha Rucki to testify in a small conference room via video-conferencing was agreed upon by all parties, including Grazzini-Rucki, a key fact ignored by Mr. Volpe and others.
Mr. Volpe did not respond to multiple requests for comment. Caroline Rice did not respond to a request on Twitter to comment about her inaccurate statement.
After being notified about the factual inaccuracies contained in Mr. Volpe’s latest story, Jacquie Kubin, President of Communities Digital News, responded that Mr. Volpe’s story had “been corrected…”
Mr. Volpe’s post from May 5, 2017 has been corrected and the claim that David Rucki was in the room during the testimony of his daughter has been removed. The updated post from Mr. Volpe does not contain any notation that the post has been corrected or updated, and similar inaccurate language about David Rucki and his sister being in the room when Samantha Rucki testified continues to appears in other posts from Mr. Volpe.
Missing in Minnesota is committed to a reporting philosophy based on facts, not fabrication
The legal drama surrounding Sandra Grazzini-Rucki in family court has created a cult-like group of followers who were drawn to Grazzini-Rucki’s case because many were also involved with their own disputes in family court. Her followers knew little about the true facts involving Grazzini-Rucki’s lawless behavior in court and her unwillingness to follow court orders.
The vast majority of Grazzini-Rucki’s online supporters have never attended a court hearing involving Grazzini-Rucki.  This reckless and flagrant disregard for the truth also extends to self-described “investigative journalists” and bloggers who continue to disseminate misinformation about the disappearance of Samantha and Gianna Rucki and the criminal trials of those charged.
During her criminal trial, Grazzini-Rucki testified that she had been repeatedly “dishonest” when she previously testified under oath in her divorce and custody proceeding with her ex-husband, David Rucki.
A page has been published on Missing in Minnesota to provide verifiable facts and primary source documents to refute false statements and fabricated incidents made by Sandra Grazzini-Rucki and her supporters: Fact vs. Fabrication.
Missing in Minnesota is committed to providing our readers with court documents, and a reporting philosophy based on facts, not fabrication. Check back to Fact vs. Fiction for updates, or follow Missing in Minnesota on Twitter.

Family Court Corruption - Bill Windsor of Lawless America and Carver Cou...


Site hosted by Build your free website today!


Bill Dahn, Landfall's Next Mayor - Nov 6, 2012

***2010 Attorney General Candidate, Bill Dahn, Position Paper***
Position Paper - Bill Dahn
2010-Minnesota Attorney General Candidate

Bill Dahn

2008 - Canditate US Senate

2006 - Independents Party Candidate for State Representative

2005 - Candidate for
Mayor, St. Paul
2001 - Candidate for Mayor, St. Paul

1998 - Candidate for Governor
1989 to date - Volunteer:
Seniors/Disabled Projects
Food, Shelter and Medical Care for Seniors, the Disabled and the Poor! YES!
Bill Dahn: German, French and Indian (Sioux and Chippewa) Descent 

Hot Tip: Mon./Tues./Wed./Thurs. Dinner at St. Matthew Church, St. Paul, MN (FREE)

Bill Dahn, 2010
Minnesota Attorney

• End Poverty
• Help the Seniors and Disabled
• Help Americans First
*Bill Dahn!
A thought about politicians:

CONTACT ME: Helping Native Americans
Freedom Fighter for All People, Hobbies - Cars


William Paul Dahn
Homestead 256 Morton St. W
St. Paul, MN 55107
Tel: (651) 453-1992
Personal web page:

Bill Dahn, member of a local St. Paul Waterfront FamilySEE: Bill's Mom in 1952 Flood
BUSJesse VenturaCertificationAbout BillPolitical

Appeal Ventura v. Dahn, 2003
257 NW.2d, 361
State of Minnesota ex rel. J. J. WILD, M. D., Ph. D., Appellant,
James C. OTIS, Esquire, Respondent.

State of Minnesota ex rel. J. J. WILD, M. D., Ph.D., Appellant,
Oscar R KNUTSON, Esq., et al., Respondents.

Nos. 4689S, 46882.
Supreme Court of Minnesota.
Aug. 12, 1977. 

Click here for video clip of Jesse Ventura & Dean Berkley with Bill Dahn (other Independence Party Candidate for Governor): pre-election, MN. Governors Race, 1998.
NOTICE: This involves over 15 minutes download time with 56 K dial up Internet Connection!

Turn music on and off here
Web Site Donated by:

This site presents biographical data about Bill Dahn: the Humanitarian, Community Activist/Volunteer, and Friend to many in need. This site is not intended to be a political advertisement or forum. OpusArts LLC. does not endorse or condemn any political opinions which may be inferred by viewers of this site. The contents of this site is supplied by Bill Dahn and Associates. OpusArts LLC. is not responsible for the content of this site.

Site hosted by Build your free website today!


Site hosted by Build your free website today!

Pictures available on March 23, 2006:
Best regards from,
***LETTER TO CITY ATTORNEY 4/17/2006 and 4/18/2006 RE: Appeal 4/18/2006, presumed continued Fax: 4/17/2006 | Fax: 4/18/2006

***Writ of Prohibition
HOMEIs this another Betty Speaker Story?
SEE Cases: MINNESOTA v. OLSON, 495 U.S. 91 (1990)
Sharon at e-democracy: Click here | Sharon's Briefs: Click here

Eminent Domain Reform, Passed May 15, 2006
DOWNLOAD - Technical specs and letter code SP Water 4/18/2006:
document 1 | document 2
• Durable Power of Attorney - 2006 • E-Democracy
BFA (broken faracturesd ankle:


Site hosted by Build your free website today!

Wednesday, February 11, 2009

Friday, December 26, 2008

Us V.Blagojecvch 78

Check out this SlideShare Presentation:
Us V.Blagojecvch 78
View SlideShare document or Upload your own.

Wednesday, September 24, 2008

Whistleblowers Objections,HR 985 $700Billion Bailout Bill

Make a Donation

Take Action Now

Confidential Fraud Report

Take Action

Confidential Fraud Report

Whistleblower Law Books

Attroney Referrals

Survey of Presidential Candidates

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Sign up for Email Alerts


CFC # 10222

On Deadline? Contact the Press Director Now!

Please only use the above link if you are on a deadline. Click HERE To join our press list or to request an interview.


HomeElected OfficialsIssues and LegislationElection and CandidatesMedia Guide
Action Alert
Take ActionDemand Whistleblower Protection in the Congressional Bailout Bill!

Congress is about to hand out billions of dollars to bail out the financial industry. To prevent fraud and wasted funds, all employees in the public and private sectors must have whistleblower protection.

Take Action! Tell Congress to protect whistleblowers in the bailout bill!

Thanks to your support, last year strong whistleblower protection legislation was sent to both houses of Congress.Unfortunately Congress and the President have delayed passage of this critical law. They must act now! Congress must attach the Whistleblower Protection Act (HR. 985) and corporate whistleblower protections to the bailout bill.

Take Action! Whistleblowers are essential in protecting Americans from financial fraud!

The attachment of HR 985 and corporate whistleblower protections is crucial because whistleblowers are the only ones who can protect Americans from financial fraud. Our country is currently in the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression and we need comprehensive whistleblower protections in the bailout bill to ensure that history does not repeat itself again.

Right now, Congress is engaged in final negotiations on the bailout bill. The NWC is joining with many other organizations to press for this legislation. We have to act fast to demand whistleblower protection!

Take Action

Enter your zip code to take action!

1Compose Message
Message Recipients:
Your U.S. Senate Candidate
Your U.S. House Candidate
Delivery Method:
Printed Letter
Subject: Attach HR.985 to the bailout bill
Required text:
(This text will be included in your message)
As your constituent, I urge you to include HR 985 and corporate whistleblower protections as part of the $700 billion bailout bill that is now under consideration by Congress. HR 985, also known as The Whistleblower Protection Enhancement Act of 2007, provides increased whistleblower protections for federal employees. As Congress considers the best response to our country�s current economic crisis, it is of the upmost importance to prevent the same economic disaster from occuring again. Our current economic crisis, caused in part by secrecy within financial institutions, highlights the need for comprehensive whistleblower protections. The attachment of HR 985 and corporate whistleblower protections to the bailout bill is crucial because whistleblowers are the only ones who can protect Americans from financial fraud. Please do not miss this opportunity to increase government accountability by adding whistleblower protections to the bailout bill.
Your Closing: Your Name:
2Sender Information
This system requires that you provide your name and contact information. This information will not be used for any purpose other than to identify you to the recipient.
Your Contact Information:
Prefix (required by some officials)
First* Last*
State* ZIP* ZIP + 4
Remember Me! (what's this?)
Sign me up for the Action E-List.
A copy of your message will be sent to the e-mail address entered above.
3Capwiz·XC Authentication
This step helps distinguish your message from other e-mails sent to elected officials by marking it as authentic. Enter the numbers you see into the blank field on the right.
Can't see the numbers? Why we do this.


REG Z & FIAFEA & FIRREA Truth in Lending

Widgetbox Blog Network: Politics

A Tale of Hoppy



Sharon Anderson Author-ForensicAnalyst